Which legal concept is typically linked with full and limited tort?

The connection between full and limited tort is primarily tied to insurance claims and financial compensation in the context of personal injury law. In many states, when individuals purchase car insurance, they often have the option to choose between full tort and limited tort coverage.

Selecting full tort coverage enables policyholders to retain the right to sue for any damages related to injuries sustained in an accident. This would include not only economic losses, such as medical bills and lost wages, but also non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. Essentially, full tort coverage provides broader rights to seek compensation.

On the other hand, limited tort coverage restricts the ability to recover for non-economic damages unless certain conditions are met, such as suffering a "serious injury." This limitation can significantly affect the financial compensation that an individual can receive after an accident, thereby linking these concepts directly to how insurance claims are processed and the compensation that individuals can pursue.

The other options, while important in their own contexts, do not directly relate to the concepts of full and limited tort in the landscape of insurance and personal injury law. Employment law disputes involve employer-employee relations, property rights claims pertain to ownership and title issues, and criminal liability deals with offenses against the state, none of which